Well, is it? It's a swell question, is it not? Is in attendance any legality in it, because in attendance are those ancestors who would have you reflect that it is tough to be saved? Just by link and done innuendo, the model that mortal blest is hard, suggests we have something to do near our one saved, but is this true? Surely, state saved, if it involves effort, toil, risky choices and/or industrious connection on our part, it essential then, by association, be hard? In decree to reply these questions frankly we need to know, prime and foremost, what saving is in the past we can ascertain as to whether it is problematic to be ransomed or not.
Before I clutch on, mayhap another to the point interrogate would be whose will is it that we should be saved? Is it our will, our pet budgerigar's will, our mum's will, Uncle Tom Cobbley's will or even our regional pastor's will? Finally, could it merely be God's will? Ever reflection of that? Have you of all time reasoned that it may fair believably be that it is only the Father God's will that any man or adult female be ransomed and no one else's will?Furthermore, as an example, was it Samuel's will or Jeremiah's will that they should be blessed and titled to be nebiim of The Lord or was it morally God's will? Let's publication it in Holy Scripture and see for ourselves to brainstorm out: